December 17, 2019

Ninth Circuit ruling stands: cities cannot criminalize sleeping outdoors

A story in yesterday’s Guardian details the refusal by the United States Supreme Court to hear an appeal of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in Martin v City of Boise. The Martin decision held that laws criminalizing “camping” constituted cruel and unusual punishment on the part of cities that did not provide enough shelter beds and other services to provide unhoused persons with an alternative to sleeping outdoors. The Court’s refusal to hear the appeal leaves the ruling in place, blocking for now the effort by a group of West Coast cities to deal with their housing and displacement crises by criminalizing homelessness. Addressing the multiple legal, political, and social factors driving displacement and homelessness, and achieving real progress on housing justice, faces a long road ahead. Today we are grateful that we are at least not beginning a new year in that struggle faced with a set of laws that would actively exacerbate the problem and deepen its injustice.

Related Articles

March 20 @ 1:05 am

Trial advocacy training at BayLegal

This January, more than 35 Bay Area Legal Aid staff attorneys and managers built their capacity and honed their skills…

March 20 @ 1:05 am

“A qualified yes”: new Social Security rules on remote appeal hearings

The AARP website features an in-depth examination of new Social Security Administration (SSA) rules for remote access to appeal hearings….

March 20 @ 1:05 am

Update on BayLegal’s 2024 Needs Assessment Report

BayLegal wants to express its gratitude to everyone who has taken part in our 2024 Client Needs Assessment Survey process. …